physics discussion question and need support to help me learn.
The first writing assignment is the 2004 National Geographic article “Was Darwin Wrong?” by David Quammen (see link below). Please read the article and write a 4 page paper (double-spaced, 10-12 pt font, 1000-1500 words) for submission. Each paper should consist primarily of a very detailed review of the article (use the first 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 pages to tell me what the article was about), with a short discussion section at the end (last 1/2 page). Do not cut-n-paste from the text or other sources, and do not include quotations from the article. We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question
and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since
we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do
it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist
our team in referencing, specifications and future communication. 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER INFORMATION" section
and click “PRICE CALCULATION” at the bottom to calculate your order
price. 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of
pages from the drop-down menus. 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account
with us for record keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT”
at the bottom of the page. 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment
process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it. Need help with this assignment? Discount Code: SAVE25
For the discussion section, pick out and discuss some aspect of the article that you found to be the most interesting, surprising, and/or problematic. Please discuss why this topic was noteworthy to you. Feel free to express your personal opinions, including agreement or disagreement with Quammen’s arguments (and your reasoning behind these stances).
Don’t worry about a particular ‘style’ (e.g., APA, Chicago), but do use college-level grammar, paragraph and sentence formatting, spelling, etc.
Be aware that the use of various forms of AI software like ChatGBT and some uses of Grammarly to generate text for this written assignment is considered plagiarism. Use of these programs for submitted work will result in an assignment grade of 0 and submission of your name to the Maxient system for academic dishonesty. Please see the syllabus section entitled “Academic Integrity” for a discussion of plagiarism and associated penalties.
Article 2 Was Darwin Wrong? DAVID QuAMMEN E volution by natural :.election, lhe ccnlral concept or the life’s work of Ch:ule> Darwin, is 😮 theory. It’s a theory about the origin of adaptation. complexity. and diversity among Eanh’s living creatures. If you arc skeptical by nature. unfamiliar will> the terminology of :,cience. and unaware of 1hc overwhelming evidence, you might even he tempted to
ANNUAL EDITIONS essential points are ~lightly more cc.unp1icatcd than most people aS
:md horses and hagfish and honeysuckle. bacteria are pan of the continuum of life. all shaped ;ond diversified by evolutionary fOI’CCS. Even viru~Cf; belong 10 that continuun1. Some viruses cvoJve quickly. some ~lowly. Amo1lg 1he fa.”ttcst i~ HIV. bc..~ause its method or replicating itself involves a high rate of mutation. and !hose murarions allow the viru.> 10 assume new fomt>. Aflcr just a few years of infeclion and drug trca11nem, each HJV p~ttien1 canie~ a unique vel’:-oion of Lhe vinas. lsololiOn within one infected person. plus differing conditions and the struggle to survive. forc;e, each version or HIY to evolve independently. It’s nOibing but a speeded up and microscopic “”‘”‘ of wbat Darwin saw in the Galapagos-except that each human body is m1 island. and the newly evolved l’onns aren ‘1 so channing as tlocbes or mockingbirds. Umle.rstanding bow quickly lilY acquires resist anile to antivita) drugs, such as AZT. bas been crucial 10 improving trcalmcnl by way of multiple drug cocktails. ~This approach has reduced deoth.< due 10 IUY by severalfold since 1996." a~-eording to Palurnbi. •·and jt has grcmly slowed Lhc cvolutioo of chis disease within p:.lticnts." Insects and weeds acquire rcsislance to our insecticides and herbicides through the same process. As we human.< try lo poison them. C\'Oiution by Mtur.tl selection transfonns the population of a mosqujto or thisrlc into :• new son of creature. le-.s ''tolnerablc to thai particular poison. So we invent tutother poison, then nnother.lt's a futileefl'<>o1. Even DDT, wi1h it> ferocious and lcmg-lasling effects throu~hout ecosystems. produced re.._ist;rnt bou~ nics within a decade of its discO\·cry iu 1939. By 1990 more than 500 species (includmg 114 kinds of mosquitoes) bad ~uired resis~ance to nt least one pesticide. Based on these undesired resuhs, Stephen Pnlumbi has comrnenled glumly, ”humans 111ay be lhe wol’ld’s Uomina•lf evolutionary force.’• Among mosl lorm~ of living creature.~. evolution proc.ccd.s ;.lowly-100 slowly to be observed by a single scientist within a research tifetimc. But science functions by inference. not just by direct observntion, and the inferenlial wns of evidence such as paleontology ;mel hiogcogl’aphy arc no less cogent si on ply because 1hcy’rc indirect. Still, skeptic.< of evolmionary lhcory :lJ;k: Can we~ evolution in acrion1 Can it be observed io the wild? Can it be measured in the labor.ttory? 111¢ answer i' yes. Peter nnd Ro.emary Gr.tnt. two Britishhom researchers who have spent d~"Cadcs where Charle.\ Darwin spent weeks, htovc CUI>tured a glimpse of evolution with their long-tenn studies of bc:lk size among Galapagos finches. William R. Rice and George W. Suit achieved something similar in their lab. thn>ugh an experiment io,•olving 35 generations of lhc fruit fly Drosophila mrltmoflu>ler. Richard E. l.cn,ki and his colleagues at Michigan Stale Urtiversity have done it too, tracking 20.000 generation’ of evolution in the bac1crium Escherichia l'(j/i, Such tield sLudics and lab experiments document anages\e~i~LhaL is. ~low evolutionary chang..: within a >ingle. unsplit lineage. \\r,th patience il can be seen, like thc nw,-ement of n minute band on a clock. Speciation, when a lineage splitS into IWO specie>. i> the other major phase of evolutionary change, mak.inA possible the 9 Article 2 .. Was Darwin Wrong? divergence between lineages about whicb D
ANNUAL EDITIONS A Pakistani colleague found the fragment’s other half. When Gingerich filled the two pieces together, he had a moment of humbling recognition: The molecular biologistS were right. Here wa.~ al) a1lklebone, from a four .. fcgged whale daring back 47million years, !hat closely resembled the homologus ani
Who We Are
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Is it hard to Place an Order?
Need help with this assignment?
Discount Code: SAVE25